Daily Journal Masthead

Previously abandoned corridor project included in budget bill


Follow Daily Journal:

Photos:

In 2006, then-Gov. Mitch Daniels proposed a beltway that would pass through Johnson County south of Franklin. The Indiana Commerce Connector, as it was called at the time, would be a partial loop outside of Interstate 465. The exact route of the beltway was never defined, but officials estimated -- based on drawings released by the state -- that the road would pass somewhere between State Road 44 and State Road 252.
GRAPHIC BY ANNA PERLICH
In 2006, then-Gov. Mitch Daniels proposed a beltway that would pass through Johnson County south of Franklin. The Indiana Commerce Connector, as it was called at the time, would be a partial loop outside of Interstate 465. The exact route of the beltway was never defined, but officials estimated -- based on drawings released by the state -- that the road would pass somewhere between State Road 44 and State Road 252. GRAPHIC BY ANNA PERLICH


Residents thought the proposal to build an outer beltway that would pass through Johnson County, south of Franklin, was dead.

But the proposal to create a toll road bypass billed as the Indiana Commerce Connector through southern Johnson County and other surrounding counties is back, at least as a possible future project.

The Indiana State Senate has approved a budget that sets aside $200 million every two years for future road projects, and the Indiana Commerce Connector is listed as a potential project.

State senators want to pay for more than $10 billion in roadwork during the next decade. The outer beltway hasn’t been prioritized and doesn’t have any particular funding set aside for it, according to State Sen. Greg Walker, R-Columbus.

CORRIDOR PLANS

In 2006, then-Gov. Mitch Daniels proposed a beltway that would pass through Johnson County south of Franklin. The Indiana Commerce Connector, as it was called at the time, would be a partial loop outside of Interstate 465. The exact route of the beltway was never defined, but officials estimated — based on drawings released by the state — that the road would pass somewhere between State Road 44 and State Road 252.

PROPOSAL HISTORY

What is it: The outer beltway would run between Indianapolis International Airport and the northeast side of the metro area, likely cutting through rural portions of Hancock, Shelby, Johnson, Morgan and Hendricks counties.

History: Gov. Mitch Daniels proposed the outer beltway in 2006, but hundreds of residents packed high school auditoriums and other venues in central Indiana to voice their disapproval at meetings. They often objected to the loss of farmland, rural character and property tax revenue for local governments. Daniels dropped the plan, citing public opposition in 2007.

Why it’s back: State senators included the outer beltway in a list of projects that potentially could be funded with $100 million a year in savings for future road projects. The governor and the Indiana Department of Transportation would decide whether to actually pursue the project, but some lawmakers have said it’s worth considering the Indiana Commerce Connector again to relieve congestion on Interstate 465 and especially Interstate 69 in Hamilton County.

The proposed beltway would cost an estimated $1.5 billion to $1.6 billion and create a loop beyond Interstate 465 from the northeast side of the metro area to Indianapolis International Airport. No specific route was ever discussed for the beltway, but initial sketches showed it going somewhere between State Road 44 and State Road 252 in Johnson County.

Nothing has been decided about what route the beltway would take or whether the project would be financed with the help of private investors or just federal funding, said State Sen. Brent Waltz, R-Greenwood. No planning has been done since then-Gov. Mitch Daniels dropped the project in 2007, as the result of widespread and vocal public opposition.

Outraged residents packed public hearings throughout central Indiana, and some posted signs in their yard opposing the project.

State senators this session included the Commerce Connector as a potential project that the state should set aside money for, Walker said. The state later could decide to use that money to pursue other projects, he said.

The Senate wants to start saving tax dollars from the general fund so the state can afford to pay for roadwork, Walker said. Federal excise taxes that used to go toward roads increasingly are being spent on trains, walking paths and other alternative modes of transportation, and the state is trying to ensure it has a way to pay for future projects, he said.

“If we don’t start saving today, we’ll never build another road in Indiana again,” he said.

No decisions have been made about whether the savings would go toward the outer beltway or other projects, such as completing Interstate 69 between Evansville and Indianapolis, said State Sen. Rod Bray, R-Martinsville.

“It’s just one future possibility, and there’s been no real discussion about what needs to be done,” Bray said. “When you’re talking about $200 million toward a billion-dollar project, it’s a long way off, if it’s looked at at all.”

The House version of the budget doesn’t include money for the Commerce Connector, but the chambers are trying to work on a compromise.

State lawmakers, however, ultimately decide only how much funding to set aside for road projects, and not how the money is spent. The governor and the Indiana Department of Transportation would decide whether to pursue the outer beltway.

The Indiana Department of Transportation has not been planning to revive the outer beltway project, spokesman Will Wingfield said. The agency has been studying various alternatives for transportation needs throughout central Indiana but hasn’t done any additional work on the Indiana Commerce Connector since it was dropped six years ago.

Local lawmakers said the Commerce Connector would be worth considering, especially if private investors were to help build it. Such a road could relieve congestion along Interstate 465 and especially on Interstate 69 through Hamilton County, allow semitrailer-trucks to make deliveries faster and spur economic development, they said.

But they said they’d want to hear what residents thought and had questions, such as the exact route the road would take.

The first plan failed years ago because the project was announced and property owners never knew where it would go and how it would affect them, said State Rep. Woody Burton, R-Whiteland.

The governor’s office bungled the original outer beltway proposal, but it might go better if the state first talked to property owners who might be interested in selling their land, Burton said. They could chart a route that wouldn’t be as controversial that way, he said.

“They just had a big announcement, and people thought the interstate was going through my yard,” Burton said. “You can’t go forcing that stuff on people. You have to have a coffee with the property owners, explain what you’d pay for the land and handle it in a wiser way.”

Residents who had been opposed to the original Indiana Commerce Connector said they’re upset that the idea is still being discussed after all the public outcry and are concerned with how farmland and rural lifestyles would be affected. State officials might try to wear down opposition over time by continually pushing the project, said former Johnson County Council member Charles Canary, who was a vocal opponent.

“It’s like with the people who opposed Interstate 69, where they just keep doing it until they wore them out,” he said. “You get tired of arguing against it. But they don’t have any money to fix roads up, and now they want to build something brand new.”

State lawmakers should first figure out how to pay for the completion of the new length of I-69 between Evansville and Indianapolis, before looking at another major project, Canary said.

“That’s a fiasco, that they don’t have enough money to deal with it,” he said. “We’re just jumping from one fiasco to another.”

Pursuing the Indiana Commerce Connector any further would be a waste of time and money, said Franklin resident Keegan Poe, who was a vocal opponent of the plan. The beltway would cut a swath through southern Johnson County farms that had stayed in the same families for generations, he said.

Poe said he was ready to pull his yard sign against the Indiana Commerce Connector out of his garage.

“Hopefully, it’s dead when the budgets get merged,” he said. “But it makes me nervous that they’re even talking about it.”

State lawmakers should reserve judgment on the Commerce Connector, because lease of the Indiana Toll Road proved to be successful and provided the state $2.8 billion in road funding, Waltz said. The state was able to pursue road work at a time when other states couldn’t afford it.

An outer beltway would be worth considering if more private investors wanted to help pay for it, in exchange for toll money.

But he said he was extremely sympathetic toward farmers who could be forced to sell their land and would want to ensure that drivers would have a free alternative route.

No one should be forced into paying a toll if they didn’t choose to, Waltz said. He said he’d need to know the exact route and other details before deciding whether he supported it.

“Gov. Daniels’ proposal got shot down in a few months,” he said. “A mistake the governor made is that the plan was long on rhetoric but short on details. We’d need to do more to evaluate the impact it would have.”

State Rep. John Price, R-Greenwood, said he’d be open to an outer beltway but would need more details. He said he opposed the proposal as a Johnson County Council member because of the large number of people who had been against it but said it could also give Franklin an economic boost and benefit Camp Atterbury.

“I try to see both sides of it but would want to know what my constituents have to say,” he said.

A $1.5 billion price tag would be considerable, said State Rep. David Frizzell, R-Indianapolis.

He said the project might be worthy of consideration, if only to reduce congestion and truck traffic on I-465. But he said he’d be opposed to more federal spending.

“They’re $17 trillion in debt, so I don’t know where they’re going to get the money,” he said. “That’s the question. We shouldn’t go to China and borrow more money and increase our indebtedness.”

Where they stand

Here’s a look at where local state lawmakers stand on the proposed Indiana Commerce Connector:

State Rep. David Frizzell

R-Indianapolis

Thinks project could be worthy of consideration but doesn’t favor if spending money on the project would put the federal government deeper into debt.

State Rep. John Price

 R-Greenwood

Undecided, said he’s open-minded to the idea but would first want to hear what residents thought and know more details.

State Rep. Woody Burton

R-Whiteland

Thinks road would relieve congestion but said state should base route on locations where property owners would be willing to sell. Would prefer a priority put on other road projects.

State Sen. Brent Waltz

R-Greenwood

Undecided, would be interested in public-private partnership but wouldn’t want a toll road if there were no free alternative for drivers.

State Sen. Greg Walker

R-Columbus

Said lawmakers should start the conversation about the long-term vision for roads but can’t select road projects because it would get too political.

State Sen. Rod Bray

R-Martinsville

Wasn’t in State Senate when it was originally proposed and would need more information about it.

Think your friends should see this? Share it with them!

All content copyright ©2015 Daily Journal, a division of Home News Enterprises unless otherwise noted.
All rights reserved. Privacy policy.