Letter: 2006 legislation to blame for postal service woes

Janette Morgan


To the editor:

The Postal Accountability Act of 2006, not Saturday delivery, is an expensive luxury.

I am writing in response to your Feb. 13 “Focus: Postal service” editorial. There is no mention of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006, which requires a payment of $5 billion-plus a year every year until 2017 from the postal service to fund their retiree health benefits for the next 75 years.

The article says ending Saturday service is a wise business move. What business funds 75 years of retiree health benefits? Walmart is the country’s largest employer. How much do they have saved for retiree health benefits? How much lobbying money went into the 2006 act to cripple the country’s second-largest employer, the postal service, because it has this union benefit? Ending Saturday service will not equal the $5 billion lost each year, but it will make the post office less competitive.

This story appears in the print edition of Daily Journal. Subscribers can read the entire story online by signing in here or in our e-Edition by clicking here.

All content copyright ©2015 Daily Journal, a division of Home News Enterprises unless otherwise noted.
All rights reserved. Click here to read our privacy policy.