TONGANOXIE, Kan. — When Shannon Reischman takes in the sweeping view from the big hill behind her in-laws’ farmhouse outside the northeastern Kansas town of Tonganoxie, she sees a rural oasis that’s an easy commute to Kansas City-area jobs.

Tyson Foods Inc. looked at the bedroom community of about 5,300 people and saw a good place to build a $320 million chicken-processing plant. And when the Springdale, Arkansas-based agribusiness giant announced its plans in early September, residents such as Reischman were quick to mobilize. But they weren’t on social media to court the company. They used their posts to organize protests to drive Tyson away.

Two weeks after the announcement, local officials withdrew their support. Tyson put its plans for Tonganoxie on hold and, while emphasizing that it has not abandoned them altogether, it is considering other options.

Industry and state officials are a bit mystified that any community would turn away 1,600 jobs. Kansas is still trying to attract the plant, but in another town.

“We don’t want to be a chicken town,” said Reischman, a 36-year-old mother of four who lives on a 10-acre (4-hectare) farm.

She and her neighbors see their already growing community as economically stable enough. They didn’t want it overcome by environmental problems, newly crowded schools and heavy truck traffic.

Reischman said she was sure that from the big hill with the countryside view, her family would be able to smell the Tyson operation, but, “That’s honestly the least of our concerns.”

The lesson for Tyson, state officials and the meat-processing industry was that they haven’t been active enough in recent years in defending the industry and the economic benefits of value-added agricultural development. They said the internet gives opponents of projects easy access to negative information and an ability to spread it much more quickly than in the past.

“Oftentimes, we allow the activists to dictate the playing field, and then we kind of react to it,” said Chris Young, executive director of the American Association of Meat Processors.

Tyson says it’s looking to build its first chicken-processing plant in more than 20 years to keep up with consumer demand. Company and state officials believed thousands of workers in the area would find the starting pay of $13 to $15 an hour attractive and say critics are overstating the potential environmental and community problems.

While Tyson doesn’t have a chicken-processing plant in Kansas, it has operations in six communities in the state with about 5,700 workers. They include a distribution center in Olathe and a food-processing plant in Kansas City, Kansas, both within 30 miles (50 kilometers) of Tonganoxie.

Tonganoxie’s opposition followed similar resistance last year to a proposed Prestage Farms hog-processing plant in Mason City in north-central Iowa, and a Lincoln Premium Poultry chicken-processing plant in Nickerson, Nebraska, outside Omaha. In those cases, each company chose a new location in the same region after resident protests.

A big part of the problem in Tonganoxie was the secrecy surrounding Tyson’s plans, which bred skepticism and increased residents’ anger. Reischman and others said they found out about the project on TV the night before the announcement.

Tyson and state and local officials had been quietly working together for weeks on what was code-named “Project Sunset.” State Department of Agriculture spokeswoman Heather Lansdowne said state officials assumed that local leaders being receptive to the project reflected residents’ view.

Gov. Sam Brownback and Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer were involved in efforts to attract the plant to Kansas at least by mid-June, their office calendars show.

Tonganoxie-area resident Jen Peak, a leader of the anti-Tyson group, questioned whether Tyson and state officials grasped that the community is economically strong enough to be selective about development.

It is home to an orthopedic shoe manufacturer, a firm that helps develop medical devices and an outdoor paving-stone maker.

“The entire community was just underestimated,” the 40-year-old Peak said. “I guess this is a lesson to them, going forward, to know the area that you’re trying to move into.”

Nondisclosure agreements during negotiations with local and state officials are common for a publicly traded company such as Tyson, company spokesman Worth Sparkman said.

Brownback has since acknowledged that leaders of any Kansas community wanting to attract the plant moving forward “need to step up publicly.”

“I think that’s a better way to go at it,” the Republican said.

With Tyson examining other options, officials in Sedgwick County in the Wichita area, in Cloud County in north-central Kansas, and in the southeastern Kansas town of Coffeyville have confirmed publicly that they’re pursuing the project.

All three of the other sites are at least 130 miles (210 kilometers) from Tonganoxie. There’s opposition in Sedgwick County, where residents have mobilized through a Facebook group.

The Tonganoxie project’s opponents mobilized quickly through social media. Within two days of the plant announcement, an anti-Tyson group on Facebook had 3,400 members — several hundred more people than the total registered voters inside the city. Between 2,000 and 3,000 people attended a town hall meeting that prompted area legislators to announce their opposition.

Opponents said because Tonganoxie is a Kansas City-area bedroom community, it’s not desperate for jobs paying $13 to $15 an hour. Leavenworth County’s median household income of nearly $64,000 is about 22 percent higher than the state’s.

Tonganoxie’s population has nearly doubled since 2000.

“Professionals live out here that have their jobs and their companies and their careers,” said Kirk Sours, 57, the longtime manager of the Red Angus cattle-raising Tailgate Ranch outside Tonganoxie. “This location is a perfect commuting distance for those folks.”

While the possibility that immigrants would fill the jobs fueled opposition in the Nebraska chicken-processing plant fight, critics of the Tonganoxie project said they weren’t concerned about who would do the work but whether their pay would be enough to justify the potential problems.

“If someone was going to come in and build a factory and pay 30 bucks an hour, I don’t think you’d have much resistance,” said Eric Thompson, director of the Bureau of Business Research at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.


Follow John Hanna on Twitter at https://twitter.com/apjdhanna .


Sign up for the AP’s weekly newsletter showcasing our best reporting from the Midwest and Texas: http://apne.ws/2u1RMfv